Part 2 of 3 | A 3-Part Series on Automating Proposal Generation with AI | Part 1 | Part 3
Let’s talk numbers.
The average mid-size consulting firm responds to 50-100 RFPs per year. Each response takes a team of 3-5 people anywhere from 40 to 200 hours to complete — depending on complexity. At fully-loaded billing rates of $150-250/hour, that’s $6,000 to $50,000 in labor cost per proposal.
And here’s the painful part: win rates in competitive government and enterprise procurement hover between 10-30%. That means for every proposal you win, you’ve burned the cost of 3-9 losing bids. The industry calls it “pursuit cost,” and most firms treat it as an unavoidable cost of doing business.
It doesn’t have to be.
The Proposal Bottleneck is a Human Bottleneck
Walk through any proposal bullpen during a crunch week and you’ll see the same pattern:
Day 1-2: Reading and re-reading the RFP. A senior BD lead spends an entire day parsing a 60-page document, highlighting requirements, building a compliance matrix in Excel, and cross-referencing amendments. If the RFP is poorly organized (and they often are), this can take even longer.
Day 3-5: Writing the first draft. Your best technical writers — the people who should be doing client work — are pulled off revenue-generating projects to draft sections. The executive summary gets rewritten three times. The technical approach section keeps growing. Nobody’s sure what the compliance matrix should look like because the requirements are scattered across 14 different sections of the RFP.
Day 6-7: Internal review and rework. The proposal manager realizes the pricing section references a methodology that conflicts with what the technical team wrote. The compliance matrix has gaps. A subject matter expert who was supposed to review the draft is traveling. Cue the late nights.
Day 8: Panic formatting. Someone is manually building the Word document at 11pm. Page numbers are wrong. The table of contents doesn’t match the headers. The client’s logo is pixelated. The font requirements from the RFP say Arial 11pt, but half the document is in Calibri.
This cycle repeats 50-100 times a year. The people doing this work are your most experienced, most expensive, most in-demand professionals. Every hour they spend on proposal mechanics is an hour they’re not spending on client delivery, business development, or strategic planning.
What RFP2Proposal Actually Solves
RFP2Proposal doesn’t replace your proposal team. It eliminates the mechanical work that consumes 60-70% of their time, so they can focus on the 30-40% that actually wins deals: strategy, positioning, pricing decisions, and relationship-driven content.
Here’s how the plugin maps to the proposal lifecycle:
Phase 1: RFP Analysis (From 8 Hours to 15 Minutes)
The plugin’s 12-category extraction framework reads the entire RFP and produces a structured breakdown: scope, technical requirements, timeline, budget signals, evaluation criteria and weights, compliance needs, personnel requirements, past performance expectations, client pain points, and incumbent signals.
What used to take a senior BD lead a full day now takes a conversation with Claude. And the output is more thorough, because the AI doesn’t skip sections, doesn’t get fatigued on page 47, and doesn’t forget to cross-reference an amendment against the base document.
The strategic value here isn’t just speed — it’s consistency. Every RFP gets the same rigorous analysis. No more “we missed a requirement buried in Section L.4.2.c” moments.
Phase 2: First Draft Generation (From 40 Hours to 2 Hours)
The plugin generates all 10 standard proposal sections — cover letter, executive summary, understanding of requirements, technical approach, management methodology, staffing plan, past performance, pricing structure, compliance matrix, and appendices — pre-populated with your organization’s knowledge.
Your company profile, your delivery methodology, your case studies, your team bios, your differentiators — all woven in automatically because you configured them once in the org-knowledge YAML files.
The smart placeholder system is critical here. The plugin knows the boundary between what AI can responsibly generate and what requires human judgment. Pricing figures? REQUIRED placeholder — a human must fill those in. Architecture diagram? REQUIRED. A suggestion to add a healthcare-specific case study because the client is in med-tech? SUGGESTED. Client testimonial letters? OPTIONAL.
This isn’t an AI writing your proposal for you. It’s an AI building the scaffolding, filling in what it confidently can, and flagging exactly where your experts need to step in.
Phase 3: Compliance and Quality Assurance (From 6 Hours to 30 Minutes)
The compliance-mapping skill automatically generates a compliance checklist from the RFP, mapping every mandatory requirement (“shall,” “must,” “required”) to a trackable item. The traceability matrix maps each RFP section to the corresponding proposal section with coverage status.
These are the artifacts that evaluators look for. A proposal without a clean compliance matrix gets downgraded before the evaluator even reads your technical approach. RFP2Proposal generates them as a byproduct of the proposal creation process, not as an afterthought at 11pm.
Phase 4: Export and Delivery (From 4 Hours to 5 Minutes)
The built-in MCP server generates a professionally formatted Word document with title page, table of contents, headers, footers, page numbers, and color-coded placeholders. The /export-matrix command produces an Excel traceability matrix with auto-filters, color coding, and a summary sheet.
No more manual formatting. No more broken page numbers. No more “who changed the font” emergencies.
The Business Case by the Numbers
Let’s model this for a mid-size IT consulting firm that responds to 75 RFPs per year:
Current state:
- Average effort per proposal: 80 person-hours
- Blended cost per hour (fully loaded): $175
- Annual proposal cost: 75 x 80 x $175 = $1,050,000
- Win rate: 20% (15 wins out of 75 bids)
- Cost per win: $70,000
With RFP2Proposal:
- Average effort per proposal: 25 person-hours (human review, strategy, pricing, customization)
- Annual proposal cost: 75 x 25 x $175 = $328,125
- Annual savings: $721,875
- Potential win rate improvement: 25-30% (better compliance, more consistent quality, more time for strategy)
- Cost per win: $17,500-$21,875
The math is straightforward: you’re freeing up roughly 4,125 person-hours per year. That’s the equivalent of two full-time senior consultants who can now be deployed on revenue-generating client work instead of proposal mechanics.
And the win rate improvement isn’t speculative. Proposals that are more compliant, more responsive to evaluation criteria, and more consistent in quality simply score better. The firms that win government work at above-average rates aren’t necessarily the most technically qualified — they’re the ones who submit the most disciplined, well-structured, evaluation-criteria-aligned proposals.
Who Is This For?
RFP2Proposal is built for organizations where proposals are a core business function:
IT consulting and outsourcing firms responding to government and enterprise RFPs for software development, system integration, managed services, and digital transformation projects.
Government contractors navigating the labyrinth of FAR/DFAR compliance, past performance documentation, and evaluation factor weighting in federal procurement.
Professional services firms — management consulting, engineering, environmental services, healthcare IT — that compete through written proposals with structured evaluation criteria.
Proposal management teams looking to standardize their process, reduce variance between proposals, and build an institutional knowledge base that makes every proposal better than the last.
If you don’t respond to formal RFPs, this plugin probably isn’t for you. If you respond to more than 10 per year, the ROI is likely measured in weeks, not months.
The Strategic Case: Building Institutional Memory
Beyond the immediate time and cost savings, there’s a longer-term strategic argument for RFP2Proposal.
Most consulting firms have their proposal knowledge locked inside the heads of a few senior people. When your best proposal writer leaves, they take years of institutional knowledge with them — the phrasing that resonates, the case study selection logic, the compliance patterns for specific agencies.
RFP2Proposal’s org-knowledge system is, at its core, a structured externalization of that institutional memory. Your methodology, your differentiators, your case studies, your win themes — all codified in version-controlled YAML files that any team member can access and that Claude can deploy consistently across every proposal.
This isn’t just automation. It’s knowledge management. And it compounds over time: every case study you add, every win theme you refine, every methodology update you make improves every future proposal.
Coming Up Next
In Part 3, we’ll get hands-on: installing the plugin, running the setup wizard, configuring your organization’s knowledge base, analyzing your first RFP, generating a proposal, and exporting a polished Word document. Step by step, screenshot by screenshot.
RFP2Proposal is an open-source project licensed under MIT. Contributions welcome.
GitHub: github.com/agentbee0/RFP2Proposal
Agent B 
Leave a comment